Close Menu
Articles
Latest Articles
Articles and blog posts from rat.run
Analysis
Reading Half Marathon Dashboard
Analysis and comparison of the results from the Reading Half Marathon 2014 - 2019. Find the result details of any finisher including times, splits, positions and some additional information on how this compared to other runners
Tools
Pace Converter
Convert pace to speed or speed to pace at the some time as kilometers to miles or miles to kilometers
Finish Time Predictor
Using either a previous finish time or an average pace, calculate the estimated finish time of other distances
Age Grade Calculator
Calculate an age graded score for a finish time which can be used to compare other times regardless of age, gender or even distance

Reading Half Marathon Results Dashboard

Analysis of the Reading Half Marathon Results 2014-2019. Find the result details of any finisher including times, splits, positions and some additional information on how this compared to other runners.

Search

Enter your race number or name to find your result

Compare

Name0
Race0
Name0
Race0
Compare Now

Tell the World!

Share this on Facebook, Twitter or copy the link to send however you choose such as via email or other social media. The link will bring users straight to this dashboard and, in the case of Facebook, will use the image shown here as the link image.

You can find these sharing options again at any time by clicking the share option in the 'Finish Time' section

Close
Don't show me this again

Runner

Name0
Race Number0
Club0
Category0
Add to Compare

Results

Details of the current data set used to generate this page and other data sets this runner's name is found in
Race0
Results Set0
All Years (by Matching Name)
...
Runner's name not found in any other data set

Finish Time Chart

Filter

Select the categories to show in the finish times chart

U23
Open
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60+
U23
Open
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60+
1:00 - 1:050 Finishers00
1:05 - 1:100 Finishers00
1:10 - 1:150 Finishers00
1:15 - 1:200 Finishers00
1:20 - 1:250 Finishers00
1:25 - 1:300 Finishers00
1:30 - 1:350 Finishers00
1:35 - 1:400 Finishers00
1:40 - 1:450 Finishers00
1:45 - 1:500 Finishers00
1:50 - 1:550 Finishers00
1:55 - 2:000 Finishers00
2:00 - 2:050 Finishers00
2:05 - 2:100 Finishers00
2:10 - 2:150 Finishers00
2:15 - 2:200 Finishers00
2:20 - 2:250 Finishers00
2:25 - 2:300 Finishers00
2:30 - 2:350 Finishers00
2:35 - 2:400 Finishers00
2:40 - 2:450 Finishers00
2:45 - 2:500 Finishers00
2:50 - 2:550 Finishers00
2:55 - 3:000 Finishers00
3:00 - 3:050 Finishers00
3:05 - 3:100 Finishers00
3:10 - 3:150 Finishers00
3:15 - 3:200 Finishers00
3:20 - 3:250 Finishers00
3:25 - 3:300 Finishers00
3:30 - 3:350 Finishers00
3:35 - 3:400 Finishers00
3:40 - 3:450 Finishers00
3:45 - 3:500 Finishers00
3:50 - 3:550 Finishers00
3:55 - 4:000 Finishers00

Finish Time

Chip Time0
Gun Time0
Avg Min/KM0
Avg Min/Mile0

Share

Positions

Gun Position00
Chip Position00
Chip Gender Position00
Chip Category Pos00

Some data is missing from your result, this may mean that information below this message is incorrect

Splits

Select a split to see stats for just that part of the race
Official Splits
Adjusted Splits

Official Splits

The official splits are taken directly from the official results

Adjusted Splits

The reason for the adjusted splits is that in 2015, the split timing mats were likely to only have been placed approximately and not exactly - Most notably the 20k mat which appears to have been some way out. The primary reason for this theory is that of the 13,117 runners who registered a 20k split time, only 257 registered a final split (the last 1.1k) pace faster than the previous 5k which is very surprising considering the likelihood of a fast(er) finish.

  • 20k adjusted to 4,880m
  • Final split adjusted to 1217.494m

Note that as the times are only provided at the given split positions, times cannot be recalculated but the distance can be compensated for which adjusts the average split pace.

The adjusted values are really just guesstimates based on comparing a number of runner's personal timings with official results and slightly altering them to make the final result look a little more as expected. There is nothing official about these adjusted values so don't read too much into them!

S
00:00 @ 00:00 / KM
5k
00:00 @ 00:00 / KM
10k
00:00 @ 00:00 / KM
15k
00:00 @ 00:00 / KM
20k
00:00 @ 00:00 / KM
F
Average 00:00 / KM
Split0
Split Time0
Chip Position00
Gender Position00
Category Position00
Avg Min/KM0
Avg Min/MI0

Progress

Gun and chip times, positions and position change at 5k, 10k, 15k 20k and the finish line
Gun Chip
Split Time Position Change Time Position Change
Start 00:00 0 00:00
5k 00:00 00:00 0 0 00:00 0
10k 00:00 00:00 0 0 00:00 0 0
15k 00:00 00:00 0 0 00:00 0 0
20k 00:00 00:00 0 0 00:00 0 0
Finish 00:00 00:00 0 0 00:00 0 0

Start Map

This shows you as the yellow block along with all the runners that started around you. Green blocks are runners you beat and red blocks are runners who beat you
Select a block to see details that runner then view their dashboard or add them to compare
Name0
Race Number0
Gun Time0
Click to View Add to Compare
Name0
Race Number0
Gun Time0

Notes

You were faster than 0% of other runners
It took you 0 to cross the start line!
During the last 1.1k, it is estimated that you overtook 0 people on the road... and were overtaken by 0, for a overall position change of 0. But based on chip time, you virtually overtook 0 people and were virtually overtaken by 0, for a chip position change of 0!
Your net position change from start to finish was 0
Your variance between split times up the 20k was 0
You ran the final 1.1k faster than 0% of other runners

Data on this page is entirely calculated based on the results published on the Reading Half Marathon website

Splt Positions: Overall gun and chip positions are provided in the original data, split (and starting) positions are calculated based on available times. Times are provided to the second which results in multiple runners having the same time for any given split. Where the data shows a tie, the finishing position will be used to order the split. As a result, split positions are only estimates.